The Swinging Pendulum of the Game Nations Play in International Relations: A Duplicity Diplomacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajir.2546Keywords:
Duplicity Diplomacy D20, International Relations D50, Realism D23, Constructivism D24, Geopolitics D16, Power Dynamics D19Abstract
Purpose: This paper endeavours to critically interrogate the concept of "duplicity diplomacy," positing it as an essential framework for understanding the oscillating strategies employed by states amidst the complexities of contemporary international relations. The aim is to unveil the inherent contradictions and strategic necessities that underlie this phenomenon, particularly in the context of an increasingly multipolar global landscape.
Materials and Methods: The research employs a qualitative methodology that integrates a multi-faceted analysis of empirical case studies involving significant geopolitical players. This approach encompasses semi-structured interviews with seasoned diplomats to capture experiential insights, a comprehensive content analysis of diplomatic communications to identify patterns and nuances in language and intent, as well as systematic reviews of contemporaneous media portrayals to contextualize public perceptions. By triangulating these methods, the study aims to enrich the understanding of duplicity in statecraft.
Findings: The findings indicate that duplicity diplomacy transcends a mere catalogue of deceit, emerging as a strategic necessity reflective of the intricate complexities and contradictions that characterize our current multipolar world. Empirical illustrations reveal how states frequently oscillate between cooperative rhetoric and competitive actions, engaging in ostensible displays of loyalty while simultaneously pursuing self-interested goals through subterfuge. Notably, instances of strategic alliances undermined by covert operations serve to illustrate the double-edged nature of duplicity, where short-term gains often precipitate long-term repercussions that undermine international trust and stability.
Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: The analysis raises substantial questions regarding the ethical frameworks governing diplomatic practice in the context of growing global interdependence. It posits that as the stakes of international interactions escalate, the propensity for duplicity in state behaviour is likely to intensify, necessitating a critical re-evaluation of both scholarly and practical approaches to diplomacy. This discourse invites policymakers and scholars alike to consider how established norms around transparency and accountability can be reconciled with the inherent contradictions of statecraft.
Downloads
References
Al Jazeera. (2019). Iran-Saudi rivalry: A timeline. Al Jazeera.
Arora, P., & Evans, A. (2018). Media framing and international relations. Journal of International Communication, 24(1), 85-100.
Bacon, T. (2019). The KGB's active measures during the Cold War: A look at Soviet disinformation tactics. Journal of Cold War Studies.
Benkler, Y. (2016). The age of misinformation: How tech companies made the debate on truth irrelevant. Harvard Law Review.
Bernstein, A. (2018). The North Korea crisis and US foreign policy. Hudson Institute.
Blix, H. (2003). Disarming Iraq. Pantheon Books.
Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2005). Conceptualizing the domestic sources of regional integration: Comparing Europe and Asia. The Pacific Review.
Brinkley, D. (2002). The Second World War: A biography. Penguin Books.
Carr, E. H. (1964). The Twenty years' crisis, 1919–1939: An introduction to the study of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.
Cheyns, E. (2019). The role of corporate social responsibility in the palm oil sector: Implications for farmers and environmental change. Sustainability, 11(12), 3267.
Chomsky, N. (2014). Hegemony or survival: America's quest for global dominance. Metropolitan Books.
Cohen, E. (2020). Perceptions of duplicity: Media narratives in international diplomacy. Global Media Journal, 18(3), 45-60.
Cohen, S. P. (2019). India: Emerging power. Brookings Institution Press.
Culcasi, K. (2016). Hezbollah: The unlikely ally of Iran in the Syrian conflict. Middle East Policy.
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge.
Dreiling, M., & Wolf, J. (2001). The politics of globalization: A comparison of the U.S. and European Union. American Sociological Review.
Dutta, S. (2018). India's counter-insurgency operations in Kashmir: Perceptions and realities. Security Studies.
Freeman, C. (2017). Why Russia is supporting Assad’s regime, and what that means for the future of Syria. Foreign Affairs, 96(3), 22-26.
Friedberg, A. L. (2018). A contest for supremacy: China, America, and the struggle for mastery in Asia. W.W. Norton.
Friedberg, A. L. (2020). The future of U.S.-China relations: Is conflict inevitable? International Security, 45(4), 5-50.
Friedman, A. (2016). The politics of duplicity: The role of deception in international relations. International Studies Review, 18(4), 689-706.
Gaddis, J. L. (2005). The Cold War: A new history. Penguin Press.
Gee, J. P. (2014). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. Routledge.
Gilpin, R. (1981). War and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press.
Gordon, P. (2016). The U.S. in Syria: A case of diplomatic ambivalence. The Washington Quarterly, 39(4), 159-176.
Güney, A. (2019). Turkey's dual foreign policy: Navigating between East and West. Journal of Strategic Studies, 42(2), 195-217.
Harris, S. (2020). The Saudi-Iranian rivalry and the future of the Middle East. Middle East Quarterly.
Hawthorne, A. (2021). The hidden playbook: Duplicity and diplomacy in international affairs. Foreign Affairs, 100(3), 22-28.
Herring, G. C. (2002). America's coming-of-age in the Vietnam War. The Journal of American History.
Hobsbawm, E. J. (1987). The age of empire: 1875-1914. Vintage Books.
Hovi, J., Skodvin, T., & Holst, R. (2016). The politics of the Paris Agreement. Global Environmental Politics, 16(1), 30–49.
HRW (Human Rights Watch). (2019). World report 2019: Events of 2018. Human Rights Watch.
Husain, A. (2020). Qatar's foreign policy: Balancing between rivals. Middle Eastern Studies, 56(5), 727–745.
Jentleson, B. W., & Whytock, C. (2005). Who 'won' Libya? The force-diplomacy debate and its implications for theory and practice. International Security, 30(3), 47-86.
Jowett, G. S., & O'Donnell, V. (2019). Propaganda and persuasion. Sage Publications.
Kahler, M. (2009). Complex networks and regional powers: A new approach. Global Governance, 15(4), 419–442.
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press.
Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2012). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Longman.
Kern, D. (2020). Strategic ambiguity in international diplomacy: The balancing act of power and trust. Diplomatic Studies, 30(2), 221-238.
Kissinger, H. (1994). Diplomacy. Simon & Schuster.
Krajcar, I. (2020). Operation Gladio: Understanding NATO's secret armies. Journal of International Relations.
Lake, D. A. (2018). The state and the politics of globalization: Duplicity and strategy in the international system. World Politics, 70(1), 1-30.
Liu, F. (2016). China’s response to the South China Sea arbitration: A media perspective. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 2(2), 131-148.
Luttwak, E. N. (1990). From geopolitics to geo-economics: Logic of conflict, grammar of commerce. The National Interest, 20, 17-23.
Mabon, S. (2019). Iran: The key to Middle Eastern stability? Journal of Strategic Studies.
Malinova, A. (2021). Diplomacy in a post-truth era: Countering disinformation strategies on the global stage. Global Governance.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W.W. Norton.
Menon, S. (2016). Unfolding the Kashmir conflict: India’s military operations. Asian Security Studies.
Meyer, H. (2014). The conspiracy of silence: Gladio, NATO, and the secret war in Europe. Historical Research.
Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. Knopf.
NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization). (2019). NATO's adaptation to a changing security environment. NATO Press Release.
Nkrumah, K. (1965). Neo-colonialism: The last stage of imperialism. Panaf Books.
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs.
Nye, J. S. (2008). The powers to lead. Oxford University Press.
Nye, J. S. (2009). The future of power. Public Affairs.
Paine, S. (2012). The Sino-Japanese War: China and Japan's struggle for power, 1894-1945. Journal of International Relations.
Pappé, I. (2006). The ethnic cleansing of Palestine. Oneworld Publications.
Rachman, G. (2016). Easternization: Asia's rise and America's decline. Other Press.
Rashid, A. (2015). Pakistan: A modern history. Palgrave Macmillan.
Rosenau, J. N. (1990). Never-ending wars: The international relations of the future. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 415-425.
Roudakov, A. (2016). The role of disinformation in Russia's narrative on Ukraine: From Maidan to the annexation of Crimea. Post-Soviet Affairs, 32(5), 432-445.
Schlesinger, A. M. (2004). A thousand days: John F. Kennedy in the White House. Houghton Mifflin.
Schoenherr, S. (2020). The U-2 incident: Espionage, diplomacy, and war. Cold War History.
Shin, G. W. (2016). China’s historical claims in the South China Sea: A scholarly assessment. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 16(3), 313-335.
Sidaway, J. D. (2014). The geopolitics of duplicity: Space, knowledge, and power. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 39(2), 219-232.
Simmons, B. A. (2018). Accountability in international relations: Balancing norms and interests. Global Governance, 24(3), 385-402.
Snyder, T. (2018). The road to unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America. Tim Duggan Books.
Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind Bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. Penguin.
Trachtenberg, M. (2006). The craft of international history: A guide to method. Princeton University Press.
Tucker, J. A., et al. (2018). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. Stanford University.
UN (United Nations). (2019). Humanitarian crisis in Yemen. United Nations Press Release.
UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime). (2004). United Nations Convention Against Corruption.
Väyrynen, R. (2019). The United Nations and global governance: A perspective from the global South. Global Governance, 25(4), 415–432.
Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press.
Zarakol, A. (2018). After defeat: How the East learned to live with the West. Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, H. (2016). China's narrative about the South China Sea: Domestic politics and international strategy. Journal of International Relations.
Zissis, C., & Blumenthal, D. (2020). The consequences of U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. Council on Foreign Relations.
Zurcher, E. J. (2019). The Middle East in world politics: An analysis of regional dynamics. Journal of Political Geography.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Christian C. Madubuko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
