Influence of Populism on International Trade Policies in Latin America
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajir.2463Keywords:
Populism, Trade Policies, Latin AmericaAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the influence of populism on international trade policies in Latin America.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: The study found that populism has significantly influenced international trade policies by promoting a shift toward protectionist measures. As populist leaders prioritize domestic industries and workers, there is often a push to re-evaluate existing trade agreements and relationships. This trend frequently involves imposing tariffs and trade barriers, which aim to shield local economies from perceived external threats. Additionally, populist rhetoric typically frames international trade as a zero-sum game, fostering nationalism and economic isolationism. Ultimately, the rise of populism disrupts established trade norms and compels policymakers to critically assess the socio-economic impacts of globalization, often at the expense of broader international cooperation.
Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Political economy of populism, dependency theory and constructivist theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the influence of populism on international trade policies in Latin America. Policymakers should focus on developing balanced trade policies that protect local industries while fostering international relations. Governments must adopt adaptive trade policies that include provisions for safeguarding vulnerable sectors without extreme protectionism. Establishing monitoring and evaluation systems for trade policies will allow for timely adjustments in response to populist pressures.
Downloads
References
Baker, A. (2020). The shifting dynamics of populism in Brazil's international trade policies. Journal of International Economics, 124(1), 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2020.103390
Bank of Uganda. (2022). Uganda export performance report 2018-2022. Government of Uganda.
Cruz, M., & Salas, E. (2023). The influence of populism on trade agreements in Chile: Barriers and opportunities. Latin American Politics and Society, 65(1), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2023.004
Gereffi, G. (2019). The Global Economy and Latin America: A dependency perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Ghana Statistical Service. (2022). Ghana trade data and statistics 2018-2022. Government of Ghana.
Gidron, N., & Bonikowski, B. (2020). Varieties of populism: The politics of global trade in an era of nationalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 46(1), 132-156. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073118 014342
Indonesian Ministry of Trade. (2022). Indonesia export data 2018-2022. Government of Indonesia.
Levitsky, S., & Roberts, K. M. (2020). The resurgence of populism in Latin America: Causes and consequences. Journal of Democracy, 31(1), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2020.0002
Mazzolini, L., & Vargas, M. (2021). Populism and trade policy in Argentina: A case study approach. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 24(3), 220-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2021.1884891
Ministry of Commerce & Industry. (2022). Trade statistics 2018-2022. Government of India.
Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. (2022). Japan’s export trends 2018-2022. Government of Japan.
Morales, A. (2022). The effects of populism on Bolivia's trade policies: A historical analysis. Latin American Perspectives, 49(4), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X211051294
Mudde, C. (2021). The far-right populist backlash against globalization: European trade policy and populist movements. European Political Science Review, 13(2), 157-174. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773920000437
National Bureau of Statistics, Nigeria. (2022). Nigeria export data 2018-2022. Government of Nigeria.
Panizza, F. (2019). Left-wing populism and international trade: A comparative analysis of Latin American economies. Global Trade Review, 41(3), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12203
Rojas, C., & Zuniga, D. (2021). Populism and trade protectionism in Central America: An empirical analysis. Central American Economic Review, 12(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42319-021-00043-2
Tanzania Revenue Authority. (2022). Tanzania trade and export statistics. Government of Tanzania.
Trump's tariffs. New Political Economy, 24(6), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1565219
UNCTAD. (2023). South Africa trade and export data. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
Vietnam Ministry of Industry and Trade. (2022). Vietnam’s trade statistics. Government of Vietnam.
Wendt, A. (2018). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.
World Bank. (2022). Brazil trade report. The World Bank.
World Bank. (2022). Ethiopia and sub-Saharan Africa trade overview. The World Bank.
World Bank. (2022). Senegal trade and export data 2018-2022. The World Bank.
World Bank. (2022). Turkey trade and export trends. The World Bank.
World Trade Organization. (2022). Kenya trade policy review. WTO.
Zambia Statistics Agency. (2022). Zambia export trends 2018-2022. Government of Zambia.
Zielonka, J. (2022). Counter-Revolution: Liberal Europe in Retreat. Oxford University Press
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 William Japheth
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.