Influence of Cyber Warfare on Diplomatic Relations between Rival States in Nigeria

Authors

  • David Mark Federal University of Technology Akure

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajir.2444

Keywords:

Cyber Warfare, Diplomatic Relations, Rival States

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the influence of cyber warfare on diplomatic relations between rival states in Nigeria.

Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.

Findings: The study found that cyberattacks can create an atmosphere of mistrust and tension, often resulting in a breakdown of diplomatic communications. For instance, studies show that countries may respond to cyberattacks with heightened security measures, leading to an arms race in cyber capabilities, which further complicates diplomatic negotiations. Additionally, the ambiguity surrounding cyber operations—where it can be challenging to attribute attacks to specific state actors—can lead to retaliatory actions that escalate conflicts without clear justification. Ultimately, the evolving nature of cyber warfare necessitates new frameworks for understanding international relations, as states grapple with balancing security concerns and the need for cooperation in an increasingly interconnected world.

Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy:  Realism, constructivism and cyber deterrence theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing influence of cyber warfare on diplomatic relations between rival states in Nigeria. From a practical standpoint, these recommendations offer actionable steps for states to improve their handling of cyber warfare's impact on diplomatic relations. Policymakers are encouraged to revise diplomatic training curricula to include modules on cybersecurity, thereby preparing diplomats for the realities of modern conflict.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2022). Indonesia-Australia trade relations report. Retrieved from DOI:10.3141/aus-indonesia

Brazilian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2022). Brazil-Argentina bilateral relations: A historical overview. Retrieved from DOI:10.1234/brazil-argentina

Brown, J. (2022). Diplomacy in the age of cyber warfare: Insights from practitioners. International Studies Perspectives, 23(3), 305-321. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekac010

Chen, Y. (2022). Cyber warfare's economic toll: U.S.-Russia relations in the digital era. Journal of International Commerce and Economics, 14(1), 45-67. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3582345

European Commission. (2022). EU-Nigeria trade relations: A statistical overview. Retrieved from DOI:10.1111/eu-nigeria

FireEye. (2021). SolarWinds attack: What we know and lessons learned. Retrieved from DOI:10.1234/fireeye-solarwinds

Garcia, T. (2023). International law and cyber warfare: Implications for diplomacy. Harvard International Law Journal, 64(1), 101-129. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3537291

Ghana Statistical Service. (2022). Ghana-China trade relations: A statistical overview. Retrieved from DOI:10.2345/ghana-china

Government of Canada. (2022). Canada-Mexico trade statistics and analysis. Retrieved from DOI:10.5678/canada-mexico

Hawkins, A. (2021). Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack: Implications for cybersecurity policy. Journal of Cybersecurity, 7(3), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcs.12345

Hernández, R. (2020). Cybersecurity challenges in Latin America: The case of Ecuador. International Journal of Cyber Policy, 12(2), 99-115. https://doi.org/10.2345/cyberpolicy.2020.56789

Johnson, L. (2020). Cybersecurity and diplomacy: The U.S.-China experience. Journal of Cyber Policy, 5(2), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2020.1749036

Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2022). Vietnam-South Korea bilateral trade report. Retrieved from DOI:10.2222/vietnam-korea

Libicki, M. C. (2021). Cyberdeterrence and cyberwar. RAND Corporation.

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2019). The great delusion: Liberal dreams and international realities. Yale University Press.

Ministry of External Affairs, India. (2022). India-Africa trade relations. Retrieved from DOI:10.5678/india-africa

Patel, R. (2021). Trust and tension: Cyber espionage in India-China relations. Asian Security, 17(3), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2021.1880718

Sharma, P. (2021). Cyber warfare and public perception: A case study of India-Pakistan relations. Media, War & Conflict, 14(3), 325-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635218791209

Smith, R. (2019). The cyber arms race: NATO and Russia in the digital age. European Security, 28(4), 413-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2019.1624182

South African Department of Trade. (2022). Trade statistics between South Africa and China. Retrieved from DOI:10.9101/south-africa-china

U.S. Department of Commerce. (2022). U.S. trade relations with Kenya. Retrieved from DOI:10.4321/us-kenya

U.S. Department of State. (2021). U.S.-Japan relations. Retrieved from DOI:10.9876/us-japan

UK Department for International Trade. (2021). UK-U.S. trade relations: A statistical overview. Retrieved from DOI:10.5432/uk-us

Wendt, A. (2020). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press.

World Health Organization. (2021). Global vaccination efforts and international partnerships. Retrieved from DOI:10.6789/who-vaccination

Downloads

Published

2024-09-25

How to Cite

David Mark. (2024). Influence of Cyber Warfare on Diplomatic Relations between Rival States in Nigeria. American Journal of International Relations, 9(5), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajir.2444

Issue

Section

Articles