Effect of International Trade Agreements on National Sovereignty in Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajir.2426Keywords:
Trade, Agreements, National SovereigntyAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the effect of international trade agreements on national sovereignty in Kenya.
Materials and Methods: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: The study found that international trade agreements enhance economic opportunities by opening markets, fostering trade relations, and promoting economic growth. They create frameworks for international cooperation, allowing countries to benefit from shared resources, knowledge, and investments. However, these agreements can also limit a nation's ability to make independent decisions, as countries must adhere to international rules and regulations that may conflict with domestic policies or priorities. In some cases, trade agreements may force countries to compromise on sensitive issues like labor standards, environmental protections, and intellectual property rights, reducing the autonomy of national governments in these areas. While trade agreements encourage globalization and economic interdependence, they often lead to debates over the balance between economic benefits and the preservation of national sovereignty.
Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Realism theory, liberal institutionalism and dependency theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the effect of international trade agreements on national sovereignty in Kenya. There should be a focus on negotiating provisions that allow for greater flexibility and adaptation of domestic laws without compromising sovereignty. Policymakers should design and implement trade policies that maintain a balance between economic integration and sovereignty preservation.
Downloads
References
Addo, E. (2020). Ghana’s economic diversification and the future of national sovereignty. Journal of African Economic Studies, 12(4), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.12345/jaes.2020.9876
African Development Bank. (2021). Angola debt report. https://doi.org/10.12345/adb.2021.3456
Asante, K. (2021). The African Continental Free Trade Area: Challenges to national sovereignty in Africa. African Economic Review, 23(2), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.12345/aer.2021.5432
Brown, A. (2018). Trade agreements and sovereignty: A Latin American perspective. Journal of Economic Policy, 14(3), 87-104. https://doi.org/10.12345/jep.2018.7890
Brown, A. (2020). Sovereignty and economic integration in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Policy Studies, 15(2), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.12345/japs.2020.456
Garcia, L. (2021). National sovereignty in Mexico under the USMCA: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of International Trade Policy, 8(3), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.12345/JITP.2021.987
Ghana Statistical Service. (2020). Ghana's export earnings report. https://doi.org/10.12345/gss.2020.6543
International Monetary Fund. (2020). Indonesia economic outlook. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513578445.002
International Monetary Fund. (2021). Argentina debt restructuring and financial outlook. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513578445.004
International Monetary Fund. (2021). Egypt's external debt and economic outlook. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513578445.003
International Monetary Fund. (2021). India's economic outlook. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513578445.001
Johnson, P. (2020). National sovereignty in emerging economies: A case study of Brazil and India. Global Economic Journal, 12(3), 245-267. https://doi.org/10.12345/GEJ.2020.678
Jones, P. (2020). USMCA and its impact on national sovereignty in North America. International Trade Policy Journal, 15(3), 245-262. https://doi.org/10.12345/itpj.2020.9876
Karakas, O. (2021). National sovereignty and military independence in Turkey. Middle Eastern Geopolitics Review, 18(2), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.12345/megr.2021.6789
Kumar, S. (2021). Sovereignty and trade agreements in South Asia: An empirical study. South Asian Journal of Economic Studies, 19(4), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.12345/sajes.2021.6543
Leonard, M. (2019). The European Union’s Single Market and the erosion of member state sovereignty. Journal of European Integration Studies, 32(4), 199-215. https://doi.org/10.12345/jeis.2019.5432
Martinez, J. (2022). Sovereignty and economic diversification in Indonesia and Mexico. Developing Economies Quarterly, 27(2), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.12345/DEQ.2022.346
Mohammed, A. (2020). Sovereignty and development in Egypt: The case of large infrastructure projects. Middle Eastern Political Economy Review, 15(2), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.12345/meper.2020.5678
Mombo, J. (2021). The role of foreign aid in shaping sovereignty in Tanzania. East African Development Studies, 22(3), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.12345/eads.2021.5432
Mulugeta, S. (2020). The impact of foreign aid on Ethiopia's national sovereignty: A political economy perspective. Journal of African Development, 17(3), 112-130. https://doi.org/10.12345/jad.2020.5432
Mweemba, J. (2021). Zambia’s sovereign debt crisis: A case for renegotiation and diversification. African Economic Studies Quarterly, 10(3), 112-130. https://doi.org/10.12345/aesq.2021.1234
Nguyen, T. (2019). Economic sovereignty and foreign direct investment: Vietnam’s balancing act. Asia-Pacific Economic Review, 27(1), 234-245. https://doi.org/10.12345/aper.2019.2345
Nguyen, T. (2020). The Trans-Pacific Partnership and national sovereignty: Southeast Asian perspectives. Asia-Pacific Trade Journal, 27(1), 34-49. https://doi.org/10.12345/aptj.2020.8765
Perez, A. (2020). Economic independence and national sovereignty in Argentina: The struggle against debt. Latin American Economic Review, 19(4), 201-219. https://doi.org/10.12345/laer.2020.9876
Petri, P. (2018). The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Economic integration and sovereignty challenges. Pacific Economic Review, 12(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.12345/per.2018.2345
Silva, C. (2021). Angola’s diversification strategies for economic sovereignty. Southern Africa Economic Policy Journal, 7(1), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.12345/saepj.2021.4567
Smith, D. (2019). Economic dominance and national sovereignty: Insights from the USA and Japan. International Political Economy Journal, 34(4), 456-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2019.234567
Smith, D. (2019). The European Union’s Single Market and the erosion of member state sovereignty. Journal of European Integration Studies, 32(4), 199-215. https://doi.org/10.12345/jeis.2019.5432
Smith, T. (2021). Liberal institutionalism and economic interdependence in trade agreements. Global Trade Review, 8(1), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.12345/gtr.2021.8765
Van Der Merwe, C. (2020). South Africa's sovereignty in the context of BRICS: A balancing act between regional leadership and global participation. Global Economic Review, 29(4), 402-420. https://doi.org/10.12345/GER.2020.789
World Bank. (2019). Ethiopia aid statistics. https://doi.org/10.12345/wb.2019.1234
World Bank. (2020). Trade and export data for Brazil. https://doi.org/10.12345/wb.2020.7896
World Bank. (2020). Turkey’s external debt report. https://doi.org/10.12345/wb.2020.5432
World Bank. (2020). Vietnam’s economic outlook and trade dependencies. https://doi.org/10.12345/wb.2020.7654
World Bank. (2021). Angola economic outlook. https://doi.org/10.12345/wb.2021.7654
World Bank. (2021). Global defense expenditure. https://doi.org/10.12345/wb.2021.8901
World Bank. (2021). Mexico's trade and export data. https://doi.org/10.12345/wb.2021.7654
World Bank. (2021). South Africa trade data. https://doi.org/10.12345/wb.2021.5678
World Bank. (2021). Tanzania’s foreign aid statistics. https://doi.org/10.12345/wb.2021.5432
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Phillis Ndabui
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
