The Role of Carrot Diplomacy in Advancing National Interests: A Critical Examination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajir.2415Keywords:
Carrot Diplomacy F51, International Relations F50, Soft Power F51, Geopolitical Strategy F50, Trust-Building D85Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to critically analyse the concept of carrot diplomacy, defined as the strategic deployment of attractive incentives designed to elicit behavioural modifications in other states, thereby advancing national interests. The study positions carrot diplomacy as a transformative approach within the contemporary landscape of international relations, distinctly contrasting it with coercive stick diplomacy, which is reliant on punitive measures (Arguello & Marcouiller, 2018; Nye, 2004).
Materials and Methods: This investigation employs a comprehensive and rigorous methodology, integrating theoretical frameworks from established international relations theories (Wendt, 1999). A qualitative analysis is conducted through an examination of salient case studies, including the European Union's initiatives towards Eastern European nations (Youngs, 2010), the re-establishment of diplomatic relations between the United States and Cuba during the Obama administration (Gibbons, 2016), and the expansive Belt and Road Initiative spearheaded by China (Hillman, 2018). This multi-faceted approach allows for a deeper understanding of the operational and contextual factors influencing the effectiveness of carrot diplomacy. Additionally, the theoretical framework underpinning this paper is multi-dimensional, drawing on constructivist, liberal, and realist paradigms in international relations. The analysis explores the dynamics of soft power and relational engagement in diplomacy, positing that carrot diplomacy can serve not only as a mechanism for achieving specific foreign policy objectives but also as a means of building trust and fostering long-term collaboration (Katz, 2020).
Findings: The findings of this study reveal that while carrot diplomacy can effectively facilitate diplomatic objectives and enhance states’ soft power, it is not without limitations. The efficacy of such diplomatic endeavours is contingent upon several critical factors, including the sustainability and perceived legitimacy of the incentives offered, as well as the credibility of the initiating state (Hofstede, 2001). The study identifies potential backlash when incentives are deemed insincere or conditional, which can significantly undermine diplomatic relations (O’Donnell, 2017).
Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Considering these findings, the paper argues that for carrot diplomacy to function as a viable tool for achieving national interests, policymakers must engage in the meticulous calibration of incentives to ensure they align authentically with the strategic aspirations and expectations of the recipient states (Bilgin & Morton, 2002). This nuanced understanding is vital for navigating the complexities inherent in contemporary international engagements, particularly as states endeavour to cultivate sustainable diplomatic outcomes amidst an increasingly polarized global environment. By synthesizing theoretical insights with practical applications and case studies, this study contributes to the broader discourse on effective diplomacy, emphasizing the need for adaptable, context-sensitive approaches that prioritize trust and genuine collaboration.
Downloads
References
Acharya, A. (2014). The making of Southeast Asia: International relations of a region. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Alexander, C. (2020). The soft power of development: Aid and assistance as public diplomacy activities. In J. Servaes (Ed.), Handbook of communication for development and social change (pp. 1-12). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2014-3_74
Ang, I., Isa, Y. R., & Mar, P. (2015). Cultural diplomacy: beyond the national interest? International Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. 21 (4). https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2015.1042474
Arnold, A. (2017). Cuba-U.S. relations: Obama and beyond. International Journal of Cuban Studies, 9(2), 271-272. https://doi.org/10.13169/intejcubastud.9.2.0271
Barrinha, A. & Renard, T. (2017). Cyber-diplomacy: The making of an international society in the digital age. Global Affairs, 3(4–5), 353-364 https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2017.1414924
Bernardo, C. et. al. (2021). Achieving consensus in multilateral international negotiations: The case study of the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change. Science Advances, vol 7, (51). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv. abg8068
Bilgin, P., & Morton, A. D. (2002). Post-colonialism and the discipline of international relations. The European Journal of International Relations, 8(3), 295-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066102008003005
Bjola, C., & Kornprobst, M. (2018). Understanding international diplomacy: Theory, practice, and ethics. Routledge.
Brading, R. (2024). International relations in a multipolar world. Eur Polit Sci 23, 106–107. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-023-00435-8
Clarke, D. (2020). Cultural diplomacy.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.543
Cohen, R. (1998). Negotiating across cultures: International communication in an interdependent world. United States Institute of Peace Press; 2nd edition ISBN-10: 9781878379726
Dekker, E., Remic, B., & Dalla Chiesa, C. (2019). Incentives matter, but what do they mean? Understanding the meaning of market coordination. Review of Political Economy, 32(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2019.1628341
Duzgun, E. (2022). Radicalising Global IR: Modernity, Capitalism, and the Question of Eurocentrism. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol 15, (3), pp 313–333, https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poac012
Filmus, E. (2015). Sticks and carrots in coercive diplomacy: Toward a theory of inducements. A paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts degree in the Master of Arts Program in the Committee on International Relations, University of Chicago.
Fukuyama, F. (2011). The origins of political order: From prehuman times to the French revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Goddard, S., & Nexon, D. H. (2016). The dynamics of global power politics: A framework for analysis. Journal of Global Security Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogv007
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Izotov, A., Raik, K., & Sekarev, A. (2013). The Post-Vilnius Challenges of the Eastern Partnership. Papers presented at the Panel ‘Russia, EU`s Eastern Partnership and Vilnus Summit’ of the 13th Annual Aleksanteri Conference ‘Russia and the World’. Aleksanteri Institute of the University of Helsinki. October 23-25, 2013, Helsinki, Finland, edited by Vahur Made.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
K Kirk, S. (2019). The shifting sands of U.S.-Cuba relations: Continuity and change. Cuba in Transition, 29, 78-92.
Klymenko, L., & Siddi, M. (2020). Exploring the link between historical memory and foreign policy: An introduction. International Politics, 57(6), 945–953. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00269-x
Kuik, C. C. (2021). Irresistible Inducement? Assessing China's Belt and Road Initiative in SoutheastAsia.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369198174_Irresistible_Inducement_Assessing_China's_Belt_and_Road_Initiative_in_Southeast_Asia
Kuhlmann, J., & Weitz, R. (2019). Strategies of influence: Carrot diplomacy in global politics. Foreign Policy Analysis, 15(3), 434-451.
Lee, J. T. (2015). Soft Power and Cultural Diplomacy: Emerging Education Hubs in Asia. Comparative Education, 51(3), 353-374.
Lee, So Jin (2021). Carrots or Sticks? Positive Inducements and Sanctions in International Relations. Dissertation, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/24354.
Lukyanov, F. (2020). The European Union and its eastern neighbours: A relationship of ambivalence. Journal of European Integration, 42(1), 1-20.
Mamdani, M. (2001). When victims become killers: Colonialism, nativism, and the genocide in Rwanda. Princeton University Press.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). The tragedy of great power politics. New York: Norton & Company.
McCornick, J. (2017). Carrots, Sticks and Sermons: Policy Instruments and their Evaluation. Comparative Policy Evaluation.
Miao, J. T. (2021). Understanding the soft power of China’s Belt and Road Initiative through a discourse analysis in Europe. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 8(1), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2021.1921612
Nair, D. (2019). Saving face in diplomacy: A political sociology of face-to-face interactions in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Department of Political Science, National University of Singapore, volume 25, (3) https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066118822.
Nayyar, D. (2019). Globalization in historical perspective. In M. Nissanke & J. A. Ocampo (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Development Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14000-7_19
Ni, J. (2024). A decade of the belt and road initiative and its global impact. China Economic Journal, Volume 17, Issue https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2024.2345532
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.
Nye, J. S. (2019). Soft power and the public diplomacy revisited. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14(1), 1-14.
Oberthür, S., & Dupont, C. (2021). The European Union’s international climate leadership: Towards a grand climate strategy? Climate Policy, 21(4), 476-488.
Orfeo Fioretos, & Tallberg, J. (2021). Politics and theory of global governance. International Theory, Vol.13, (1) pp. 99 – 111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971920000408.
Ozkececi-Taner, B. (2017). Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.414
Pradumna, B & Rana, X. J. (2020). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Impacts on Asia and Policy Agenda. Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Impacts on Asia and Policy Agenda | SpringerLink.
Ramesh, M. (2021). The United States, China, and the Politics of Hegemonic Ordering in East Asia. International Studies Review, 23(4), 1208–1229. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa096
Rimmer, P. J. (2018). China's Belt and Road Initiative: Underlying economic and international relations dimensions. Asia Policy, 14(1), 89-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.12247
Rosen, J. D., & Kassab, H. S. (2016). U.S.–Cuba Relations: Charting a New Path (Security in the Americas in the Twenty-First Century). Lexington Books.
Saaida, M. (2023). Understanding Global Politics and Diplomacy within the International Relations Context. ResearchGate. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10841899
Saramago, A. (2021). Political Trust in International Relations. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M., Brandli, L., Lange Salvia, A., Özuyar, P.G., Wall, T. (eds) Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71066-2_91-1
Secchi, C., & Villafranca, A. (Eds). (2011). Global Governance and the Role of the EU: Assessing the Future Balance of Power. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781003558
Shifrinson, J. (2018). The rise of China, balance of power theory and US national security: Reasons for optimism? Journal of Strategic Studies, 43(2), 175–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2018.1558056.
Thakur, R. C. (2012). The Responsibility to Protect: Norms, Laws, and the Use of Force in International Politics. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/53779.
Tilly, C. (2005). The politics of collective violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Topić, M. (2020). Cultural diplomacy and international cultural relations. Cultural Trends, 29(3), 254–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2020.1799336
Tyushka, A. & Schumache, T. (2021). The European Union and Its Eastern Neighbourhood: Whither ‘Eastern Partnership’? Routledge.
van Kersbergen, C. J., & Verbeek, B. (2007). The politics of international norms: Subsidiarity and the imperfect competence regime of the European Union. European Journal of International Relations, 13(2), 217-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107076955
Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York: Random House.
Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press.
Wike, R. & Fetterolf, J. (2021). Global Public Opinion in an Era of Democratic Anxiety. Pew Research Centre.
Zagare, F. C. (2020). The Carrot and Stick Approach to Coercive Diplomacy. International Journal of Development and Conflict, 10, 105–115.
Zou, L. (2018). The political economy of China’s Belt and Road Initiative. International Enterprise Studies, 22(2), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1142/10508
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Christian C. Madubuko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
