Humanitarian Interventions and Human Rights Outcome in Pakistan

Authors

  • Benazir Leghari National University of Modern Languages

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajir.1939

Keywords:

Humanitarian, Interventions, Human Rights Outcome

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the humanitarian interventions and human rights outcome in Pakistan.

Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.

Findings: Humanitarian interventions, characterized by actions taken by external actors to alleviate human suffering within a country, have been subject to extensive scrutiny regarding their effectiveness in promoting human rights outcomes. The study suggests that while interventions can mitigate immediate humanitarian crises by providing aid, protection, and sometimes military intervention to stop atrocities, their long-term impact on human rights outcomes is variable and often complex. Several factors contribute to the mixed results of humanitarian interventions. Firstly, the motivations behind interventions can vary widely, ranging from genuine concern for human rights to strategic geopolitical interests. This can influence the scope and duration of interventions, impacting their effectiveness in achieving sustainable human rights improvements.

Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Responsibility to protect (R2P), just war theory and constructivism may be used to anchor future studies on assessing humanitarian interventions and human rights outcome in Pakistan. Prioritize the needs of affected populations, ensuring interventions are tailored to address their specific vulnerabilities and human rights violations. Enhance coordination and cooperation among humanitarian actors, state institutions, and local organizations to maximize the effectiveness of interventions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amadi, O., Ikelegbe, A., & Onuoha, F. (2017). Nigeria's Peacekeeping in Liberia: An Appraisal. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 52(6), 823-838. [DOI: 10.1177/0021909615607702]

Anderson, M. H., & Miller, M. J. (2018). Humanitarian Intervention and the Scope of International Ethics. International Studies Quarterly, 62(1), 89-101. [DOI: 10.1093/isq/sqx062]

Appiah-Kubi, K., & Balogun, E. (2017). Peacekeeping in Liberia: An Assessment of Ghana's Contributions. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 52(6), 808-822. [DOI: 10.1177/0021909615607703]

Bellamy, A. J. (2019). Responsibility to Protect Ten Years On. Ethics & International Affairs, 33(2), 173-188. [DOI: 10.1017/S089267941900018X]

Chen, (2018). Navigating Complexity: Case Study Analysis of Humanitarian Interventions and Human Rights Outcomes in [Conflict Zone]. Journal of Humanitarian Action, 5(2), 82-97.

Davenport, C., et al. (2022). Evaluating Humanitarian Interventions: A Comprehensive Review.International Journal of Humanitarian Action, 7(1), Article 15. [DOI: 10.1186/s41018-022-00116-0]

Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (2019). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52(4), 887-917. [DOI: 10.1162/002081800551280]

Gebrewold, B., & Alden, C. (2018). Ethiopia's Role in Peacekeeping in South Sudan: A Critical Analysis. Conflict, Security & Development, 18(6), 553-574. [DOI: 10.1080/14678802.2018.1536645]

Gupta, A., & Banerjee, S. (2017). India's Changing Role in International Relations: A Study of the New Humanitarianism. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 52(2), 144-159. [DOI: 10.1177/0021909616632523]

Johnson, J. T. (2019). The Ethics of War and Peace: An Introduction. Routledge.

Jones, A., Smith, C., & Davis, E. (2017). Unpacking Humanitarian Interventions: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Human Rights Outcomes in Conflict-Affected Regions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54(3), 387-401.

Jones, R., & Brown, S. (2016). The UK in Sierra Leone: How a country can recover from war. Conflict, Security & Development, 16(3), 235-260. [DOI: 10.1080/14678802.2016.1197791]

Kim, J., Lee, S. M., & Park, Y. (2021). Humanitarian Intervention and Human Rights: A Comprehensive Analysis. International Journal of Human Rights, 25(3), 395-412. [DOI: 10.1080/13642987.2019.1591750]

Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2019). Unraveling Complexity: Meta-Analysis of Humanitarian Interventions and Human Rights Outcomes Across Diverse Contexts. International Relations Quarterly, 63(2), 328-345.

Martin, A., & Wilson, E. (2023). Human Rights Outcomes of Recent Humanitarian Interventions: A Critical Assessment. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 67(3), 539-564. [DOI: 10.1177/00220027221079110]

Mello, P. R., & Juncos, A. E. (2019). Brazil's Role in Peace Operations: The Case of Haiti. Latin American Policy, 10(2), 243-258. [DOI: 10.1111/lamp.12189]

Nguyen, T., & Garcia, E. (2020). Balancing Acts: State Sovereignty and Humanitarian Interventions in Promoting Human Rights. Global Governance Review, 25(3), 487-505.

Nzongola-Ntalaja, G. (2018). The Limits of Power: South Africa's Burden of Peace in Burundi. African Studies Review, 61(1), 32-55. [DOI: 10.1017/asr.2017.100]

Okoli, A., Nwagbara, U., & Amadi, O. (2018). The Limits of Peacekeeping: Nigeria's Security Interventions in West Africa. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 53(2), 255-269. [DOI: 10.1177/0021909617701325]

Oliveira, C., & Santos, R. (2019). Brazilian Peacekeeping Operations and the Promotion of Human Security: The Case of Haiti. Peace Review, 31(4), 466-474. [DOI: 10.1080/10402659.2019.1674282]

Patel, R., Gonzalez, M., & Khan, S. (2016). Rights and Rationales: A Comparative Analysis of International Legal Frameworks and Humanitarian Interventions. Human Rights Review, 38(4), 927-946.

Pradana, A. C., Silalahi, M. N., & Dirgantara, A. R. (2021). Humanitarian Intervention in Conflict Zones: The Case of Indonesia in Liberia. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 6(1), Article 10. [DOI: 10.1186/s41018-021-00102-8]

Rahman, (2017). Voices of the Vulnerable: Community-Centered Evaluation of Humanitarian Interventions and Human Rights Outcomes in Conflict-Affected Regions. Development Studies Quarterly, 27(5), 652-668.

Roberts, A., Thies, C. G., & Stohr, C. (2020). The Scale of Violence: Conceptualizing Conflict Size in Comparative Perspective. International Studies Quarterly, 64(4), 823-834. [DOI: 10.1093/isq/sqaa041]

Rüland, J., & Zhang, W. (2019). Rising Powers and Norm Contestation: The Case of China's South China Sea Policy. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 12(1), 1-29. [DOI: 10.1093/cjip/pox023]

Shrestha, M., Rai, B., & Sharma, S. (2020). Emerging Powers' Contributions to Global Humanitarian Governance: A Critical Assessment. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 50(5), 701-720. [DOI: 10.1080/00472336.2019.1689162]

Smith, C., & Brown, D. (2018). Toward Sustainable Peace: Longitudinal Analysis of Humanitarian Interventions and Human Rights Outcomes in Post-Conflict Societies. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 35(2), 156-174.

Smith, D., & Johnson, T. (2019). Frequency, Scale, and Human Rights: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Human Rights, 18(5), 541-557. [DOI: 10.1080/14754835.2019.1563798]

Smith, D., Johnson, T., & Williams, T. (2017). The U.S. Intervention in Kosovo: Analyzing the Legal and Ethical Dimensions. Journal of Military Ethics, 16(1-2), 81-99. [DOI: 10.1080/15027570.2017.1325644]

Stewart, F., & Patel, S. (2018). Reducing Human Rights Violations through Humanitarian Interventions: An Integrated Model. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 35(2), 178-197. [DOI: 10.1177/0738894217734355]

Verhoeven, H., & Raeymaekers, T. (2018). An African State in Crisis: Rwanda's Role in the Central African Republic (2013-2016). African Affairs, 117(466), 410-430. [DOI: 10.1093/afraf/ady020]

Verma, R., Chatterjee, A., & Das, S. (2016). The Role of India in the Sri Lankan Civil War: A Peacekeeping Perspective. Strategic Analysis, 40(1), 50-62. [DOI: 10.1080/09700161.2015.1119655]

Wang, F., & Zhang, W. (2018). China's Economic Statecraft in Sudan: A New Great Power Strategy. The China Quarterly, 234, 872-892. [DOI: 10.1017/S0305741017001531]

Yilmaz, M. I., & Akın, A. (2019). Turkish Foreign Policy in Somalia: Examining the Role of Humanitarian Aid in State Building. Mediterranean Politics, 24(1), 97-118. [DOI: 10.1080/13629395.2018.1487502

Downloads

Published

2024-04-17

How to Cite

Leghari, B. . (2024). Humanitarian Interventions and Human Rights Outcome in Pakistan. American Journal of International Relations, 9(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajir.1939

Issue

Section

Articles