DOES CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL APPLY IN A VARYING MARKET CONDITIONS?

Authors

  • Michael Amoh Asiedu University of Education Winneba
  • Richard Oduro University of Education Winneba
  • Emmanuel Kojo Amoah University of Education, Winneba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajf.412

Keywords:

Bear market, bull market, capital asset pricing model, tranquil market, risk premium

Abstract

Purpose: Capital asset pricing model (CAPM) has been one of the major asset pricing tools applied on the capital market to price listed securities. Several researchers have challenged the overall efficiency and validity of the model in terms of its ability to explain the behavior of the average returns on the basis of a single variable. The debate is now taking a new trend which aimed at assessing the robustness of the model in varying market conditions and this has been the main focus of the study; that is to determine whether or not CAPM applies to securities on Ghana Stock Exchange at different market conditions.

Methodology: Data on monthly returns of 29 shares were selected from the Ghana Stock Exchange spanning from 2010 to 2018 and analyzed using regression analysis on the assumption of constant risk and varying risk situations.

Findings: The study evidenced that the systematic risks differ between bulls, tranquil and bear periods. Market conditions therefore have impact on the CAPM model. CAPM is not robust with changes in market conditions after all especially in an emerging market such as the Ghana Stock Exchange.

Contribution to theory, practice and policy: The result of this study implies that, the widely accepted CAPM for asset pricing model is not robust to changes in market conditions. It is therefore essential to predict future market conditions when formulating investment strategy as an investor. Again, investors should vary their risk premium depending on their expectation of the market conditions at the time of investment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Michael Amoh Asiedu, University of Education Winneba

 

Lecturer, Department of Accounting

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Richard Oduro, University of Education Winneba

 

Lecturer, Department of Banking and Finance

 

 

 

Emmanuel Kojo Amoah, University of Education, Winneba

 

Lecturer, Department of Mathematic Education

 

 

References

Banz, R. W. (1981). The relationship between return and market value of common stock. Journal of Financial Economics, 9, 3-18.

Black, F. (1972). Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted Borrowing, Journal of Business 45,444-455

Blume, M. E. (1975). Betas and their regression tendencies. The Journal of Finance, 30(3), 785-795.

Chen, S. N. (1982). An examination of risk-return relationship in bull and bear markets: Using time-varying betas. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 17, 265-286.

Fabozzi, F. J., & Francis, J. C. (1977). Stability tests for alphas and betas over bull and bear market conditions. The Journal of Finance, 32, 1093-1099.

Fabozzi, F. J., & Francis, J. C. (1979). Mutual fund systematic risk for bull and bear months: An empirical examination. Journal of Finance, 34, 1243-1250.

Fama, E. F. & French, K. R. (1992). The crosssection of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(1), 427-465.

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1996). Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. Journal of Finance, 51(1), 55-84.

Fabozzi, F.J. & Francis, J.C. (1977). Stability Tests for Alphas and Betas Over Bull and Bear Market Conditions, Journal of Finance, 32,1093-1099

Fabozzi, F. J., & Francis, J. C. (1979). Mutual fund systematic risk for bull and bear months: An empirical examination. Journal of Finance, 34, 1243-1250.

Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. D. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 607-636.

French, J. (2016). Estimating Time varying Beta Coefficients: An empirical study of US and ASEAN portfolios. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 32(1),19 - 34.

Granger, C.W.J. & Silvapulle, P. (2002). Capital Asset Pricing Model, Bear, Usual and Bull Market Conditions and Beta Instability A value At Risk Approach, Working Paper, 2002

Jensen, M. C., Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1972). The capital asset pricing model: Some empirical tests. Studies in the theory of capital markets, 79-12.

Jensen, M. C. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945-1964. The Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389-416.

Kim, M. K., & Zumwalt, J. K. (1979). An analysis of risk in bull and bear markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 14, 1015-1025.

Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics 47(1), 13 -37.

Elfakhani, S., Lockwood, L. J. & Zaher, T. S (2014). Small firm and value effect in the Canadian Stock Market. Journal of Financial Research 21(3).

Levy, R. A. (1971). On the short term stationarity of beta coefficients. Financial Analysts Journal, 27, 55-62.

Oduro, R. & Adam, M. A. (2012). Testing the Validity of Capital Assert Pricing Model (CAPM) and Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) on the Ghana Stock Exchange. GRP International Journal of Business and Economics 1(2) 159 - 184.

Sharpe, W. F. (1964). "˜Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk'. Journal of Finance, 19(3) 425-442.

Silverman, B.W. (1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, Chapman and Hall, London.

Spiceland, J. D., & Trapnell, J. E. (1983). The effect of market conditions and risk classifications on market model parameters. The Journal of Financial Research, 6, 217- 222.

Downloads

Published

2019-10-02

How to Cite

Asiedu, M. A., Oduro, R., & Amoah, E. K. (2019). DOES CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL APPLY IN A VARYING MARKET CONDITIONS?. American Journal of Finance, 4(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajf.412

Issue

Section

Articles