Impact of Social Media Usage on Political Polarization in the United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajc.1932Keywords:
Social Media, Political Polarization, United StatesAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of social media usage on political polarization in the United States.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: The study revealed that social media platforms tend to create echo chambers and filter bubbles, where users are exposed to information and opinions that align with their existing beliefs, reinforcing their views and increasing polarization. Algorithms designed to maximize user engagement often prioritize content that is sensational or controversial, further exacerbating this effect.
Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Selective exposure theory, social identity theory and echo chamber effect may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the impact of social media usage on political polarization in the United States. Educational institutions and media organizations should collaborate to implement comprehensive media literacy programs. Policymakers should consider regulatory measures to address algorithmic biases and ensure transparency in the curation of social media content.
Downloads
References
Albrecht, H., & Ulrichsen, K. C. (2018). Egypt's political polarization: Authoritarianism, identity, and revolutionary legitimacy. Mediterranean Politics, 23(1), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2016.1166577
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
Ames, B., & Cunha, M. P. (2018). Political polarization in Brazil. Journal of Democracy, 29(4), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0049
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130-1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa116
Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531-1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620
Centeno, M. A., & Canache, D. (2020). Venezuela: From polarization to fragmentation. Journal of Democracy, 31(2), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2020.0033
Chhibber, P., & Verma, A. (2019). Party systems and political polarization in India. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 103-119. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-101849
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2019). Polarization in the American public: Misconceptions and misreadings. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070754
Guess, A., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2019). Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances, 5(1), eaau4586. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4586
Heath, O., & Goodwin, M. (2017). The 2016 referendum, Brexit and the left behind: An aggregate-level analysis of the result. Political Quarterly, 88(3), 345-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12357
Isakhan, B., & Hameed, M. (2018). Sectarianism, polarization, and the 2018 Iraqi elections. Current History, 117(800), 293-298
Islam, M. S., & Hossain, M. A. (2018). Political polarization in Bangladesh: A study of two major political parties. Contemporary South Asia, 26(3), 305-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2018.1512951
Kublik, A., & Pankowski, R. (2020). Nationalism, populism, and political polarization in Poland. East European Politics and Societies, 34(3), 482-504. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325420902615
McCargo, D. (2019). Polarizing Thailand: Dissent in the kingdom. Journal of Democracy, 30(2), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0022
Mutahi, P., & Cheeseman, N. (2021). Ethnicity, identity, and political polarization in Kenya. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 39(2), 179-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2021.1884290
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin.
Piombo, J., & Thornhill, C. (2018). Polarization in South Africa. Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies, 45(4), 521-539. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2018.1519081
Saidi, W., & Kamel, M. (2018). Sectarian polarization in Lebanon: A role for external actors? Digest of Middle East Studies, 27(2), 292-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/dome.12167
Seligson, M. A., & Booth, J. A. (2017). Nicaragua: The unexpected politics of polarization. Journal of Democracy, 28(1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0003
Shevel, O. (2017). Identity, conflict, and public space: Ukrainians and Russians in Ukraine's Euromaidan protests. Nationalities Papers, 45(1), 4-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2016.1263185
Suberu, R. T. (2017). Ethno-regional polarization and the dilemma of democratic stability in Nigeria. Ethnopolitics, 16(3), 238-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2016.1167009
Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.
Thompson, M., & Seron, C. (2018). Populism, polarization, and public opinion in the Philippines. Pacific Affairs, 91(3), 411-432. https://doi.org/10.5509/2018913411
Tufekci, Z. (2018). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3209481
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jack Daniel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
